PEMF therapy for Parkinson’s Disease

PEMF therapy for Parkinson’s disease (PD) has been significantly researched and applied. There have been numerous trials to test efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic fields as an alternative treatment for Parkinson’s disease. PEMF therapy has neuroprotective effects and perhaps this explains why it works well for relieving Parkinson’s symptoms. Let us learn a little about Parkinson’s disease and then see how PEMF therapy works and benefits Parkinson’s disease as per available research.

PEMF therapy For Parkinsons Disease

Parkinson’s disease is a common modern ailment and the prevalence of this cerebral disease is increasing. There are links to Parkinson’s disease and neurotoxicity, which isn’t  a surprise since the world has gotten significantly polluted in the 20th century.

The American Association of Neurological Surgeons defines Parkinson’s disease as a progressive disorder of brain function due to degeneration of nerve cells in the part of brain known as substantia nigra, affecting hormonal and neurotransmitter functions, resulting in tremors, rigidity, reduced flexibility, slowness of movement and impaired balance and co-ordination. Most experts believe that this brain region becomes hyperactive in people with Parkinson’s due to the loss of dopamine.

How does PEMF therapy work?

Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy is the application of safe​1​, non-invasive pulsating magnetic fields for regenerative and functional improvement therapy purposes. Applying pulsed electromagnetic fields to the brain (called transcranial magnetic stimulation) boosts cellular oxygenation by increasing circulation to the brain and by stimulating brain mitochondria (the powerhouses of cells). These changes result in faster and increased natural cellular regeneration and repair.

Pulsed magnetic therapy devices, in general, have evolved after more than 6 decades of research and thousands of studies and hundreds of PEMF clinical trials. A number of terms have been used to describe brain stimulating magnetic fields – T-PEMF (transcranial PEMF), PEMF, TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation), rTMS (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation) and EMS (Electro-Magnetic Stimulation). All are similar technologies and vary by intensity and coil design. Therefore, when we study the available research on treating Parkinson’s disease using PEMF therapy, we consider the studies of all the above electromagnetic therapy technologies.

PEMF therapy research for Parkinson’s disease

Several studies on PEMF therapy exhibit improved gross and fine-motor (movement) function and cognitive abilities. Pulsed magnetic fields have a molecular action and significantly alter the reactivity of molecules (radicals).  With fewer free radicals there is less inflammation and aging related degeneration slows down. PEMF therapy has also been proven to alleviate depression and improve mental health​2​ (up to 40%​3​ of Parkinson’s patients have depression).

PEMFs have a great healing potential for Parkinson’s disease and a help for physical therapy and neurorehabilitation.

Published research on the effects of PEMF therapy on Parkinson’s disease has been available since early 90s.

In 1996, Dr. Reuven Sandyk from Department of Neuroscience at the Institute for Biomedical Engineering and Rehabilitation Services of Touro College, NY, treated a 73 y/o patient with a 10 year history of Parkinson’s disease using PEMFs​4​. Within a week of PEMF therapy, there was  almost complete disappearance of PD tremors, start hesitation and freezing of gait. He was also able to draw better and got back his signature.

In 1999, his research uncovered that AC PEMF therapy improves smell (olfactory function)​5​ in Parkinson’s disease. He also noticed that 7 Hz stimulation was helpful in resolving olfactory dysfunction, which is often ignored in treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Smell and yawning are often indicators of disease status and improvements in these functions means that treatment is working.

Dr. Sandyk has published several studies, and can be considered one of the key scientists from the US involved in early research on the effects of PEMF therapy for PD. In addition, to above mentioned research, he found improvements in speech impairment​6​ and restless leg syndrome​7​ among benefits.

In 2015, a joint research review study​8​ on the mechanisms and therapeutic applications of electromagnetic therapy in Parkinson’s disease by reputed researchers from Italy, Mexico and UK also concluded that PEMFs improve PD symptoms including tremor, slowness of movement and difficulty in walking. It is non-invasive, safe and improves PD patients’ quality of life.

Another large review of 470 PD patients from 2015 concluded that rTMS improves motor symptoms and tremor control for patients with PD.

In 2018, universities in Denmark conducted a randomized clinical trial​9​ to study the benefits of PEMF therapy for Parkinson’s disease. They applied 30 minute treatments using a 50 Hz PEMF field for 8-weeks and concluded that PEMF therapy does indeed benefit Parkinson’s patients, allowingthem to rise up from their chairs faster. The best results are seen in mild Parkinson’s. It’s possible that the results may have been even better if 10 Hz was used instead to stimulate neural stem cells, to result in improved potential for neuro-regeneration, according to this paper from NASA.  

There is a lot more published research on PEMF therapy for Parkinsons, In addition to the research review articles presented above, there is even more research below. We hope you find the information useful in your own search on how to use PEMF therapy effectively.

PEMF therapy for Parkinson’s Disease Research References

(1-9 cited in article), Further reading: 10-32

  1. 1.
    Vonloh M, Chen R, Kluger B. Safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: a review of the literature. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013;19(6):573-585. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.01.007
  2. 2.
    van B, Bosker F, Kortekaas R, Beersma D, Schoevers R. Treatment of depression with low-strength transcranial pulsed electromagnetic fields: A mechanistic point of view. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2016;71:137-143. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2016.07.006
  3. 3.
    Okun M, Watts R. Depression associated with Parkinson’s disease: clinical features and treatment. Neurology. 2002;58(4 Suppl 1):S63-70. doi:10.1212/wnl.58.suppl_1.s63
  4. 4.
    Sandyk R. Brief communication: electromagnetic fields improve visuospatial performance and reverse agraphia in a parkinsonian patient. Int J Neurosci. 1996;87(3-4):209-217. doi:10.3109/00207459609070839
  5. 5.
    Sandyk R. Treatment with AC pulsed electromagnetic fields improves olfactory function in Parkinson’s disease. Int J Neurosci. 1999;97(3-4):225-233. doi:10.3109/00207459909000662
  6. 6.
    Sandyk R. Speech impairment in Parkinson’s disease is improved by transcranial application of electromagnetic fields. Int J Neurosci. 1997;92(1-2):63-72. doi:10.3109/00207459708986390
  7. 7.
    Sandyk R, Iacono R, Bamford C. Spinal cord mechanisms in amitriptyline responsive restless legs syndrome in Parkinson’s disease. Int J Neurosci. 1988;38(1-2):121-124. doi:10.3109/00207458809000489
  8. 8.
    Vadalà M, Vallelunga A, Palmieri L, Palmieri B, Morales-Medina J, Iannitti T. Mechanisms and therapeutic applications of electromagnetic therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Behav Brain Funct. 2015;11:26. doi:10.1186/s12993-015-0070-z
  9. 9.
    Malling A, Morberg B, Wermuth L, Gredal O, Bech P, Jensen B. Effect of transcranial pulsed electromagnetic fields (T-PEMF) on functional rate of force development and movement speed in persons with Parkinson’s disease: A randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0204478. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204478
  10. 10.
    Sandyk R. A drug naive parkinsonian patient successfully treated with weak electromagnetic fields. Int J Neurosci. 1994;79(1-2):99-110. doi:10.3109/00207459408986071
  11. 11.
    Cardoso E, Fregni F, Martins M, et al. rTMS treatment for depression in Parkinson’s disease increases BOLD responses in the left prefrontal cortex. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008;11(2):173-183. doi:10.1017/S1461145707007961
  12. 12.
    Potrebić A, Dragasević N, Svetel M, Kostić V. [Effect of slow repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on depression in patients with Parkinson ’s disease]. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2001;129(9-10):235-238. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11928600.
  13. 13.
    Sandyk R. Weak electromagnetic fields reverse visuospatial hemi-inattention in Parkinson’s disease. Int J Neurosci. 1995;81(1-2):47-65. doi:10.3109/00207459509015298
  14. 14.
    Sandyk R. Treatment with AC pulsed electromagnetic fields improves the response to levodopa in Parkinson’s disease. Int J Neurosci. 1997;91(3-4):189-197. doi:10.3109/00207459708986376
  15. 15.
    Gironell A, Kulisevsky J, Lorenzo J, Barbanoj M, Pascual-Sedano B, Otermin P. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum in essential tremor: a controlled study. Arch Neurol. 2002;59(3):413-417. doi:10.1001/archneur.59.3.413
  16. 16.
    Shimamoto H, Takasaki K, Shigemori M, Imaizumi T, Ayabe M, Shoji H. Therapeutic effect and mechanism of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol. 2001;248 Suppl 3:III48-52. doi:10.1007/pl00007826
  17. 17.
    Obeso I, Cerasa A, Quattrone A. The Effectiveness of Transcranial Brain Stimulation in Improving Clinical Signs of Hyperkinetic Movement Disorders. Front Neurosci. 2016;9:486. doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00486
  18. 18.
    Moisello C, Blanco D, Fontanesi C, et al. TMS enhances retention of a motor skill in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Stimul. 2015;8(2):224-230. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.005
  19. 19.
    Shirota Y, Ohtsu H, Hamada M, Enomoto H, Ugawa Y, Research Committee on rTMS Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease. Supplementary motor area stimulation for Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled study. Neurology. 2013;80(15):1400-1405. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828c2f66
  20. 20.
    Cohen OS, Orlev Y, Yahalom G, et al. Repetitive deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: A feasibility study. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. January 2016:73-78. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.11.017
  21. 21.
    Wagle S, Shuster J, Chung J, et al. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Therapy in Parkinson Disease: A Meta-Analysis. PM R. 2016;8(4):356-366. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.08.009
  22. 22.
    Jacobson J. Pineal-hypothalamic tract mediation of picotesla magnetic fields in the treatment of neurological disorders. Panminerva Med. 1994;36(4):201-205. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7603740.
  23. 23.
    Anninos P, Adamopoulos A, Kotini A, Tsagas N. Nonlinear analysis of brain activity in magnetic influenced Parkinson patients. Brain Topogr. 2000;13(2):135-144. doi:10.1023/a:1026611219551
  24. 24.
    Sayın S, Cakmur R, Yener G, Yaka E, Uğurel B, Uzunel F. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for dyskinesia and motor performance in Parkinson’s disease. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21(8):1373-1376. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2013.11.025
  25. 25.
    Minks E, Mareček R, Pavlík T, Ovesná P, Bareš M. Is the cerebellum a potential target for stimulation in Parkinson’s disease? Results of 1-Hz rTMS on upper limb motor tasks. Cerebellum. 2011;10(4):804-811. doi:10.1007/s12311-011-0290-1
  26. 26.
    Spagnolo F, Coppi E, Chieffo R, et al. Interhemispheric balance in Parkinson’s disease: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Brain Stimul. 2013;6(6):892-897. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2013.05.004
  27. 27.
    Sandyk R. Improvement in word-fluency performance in Parkinson’s disease by administration of electromagnetic fields. Int J Neurosci. 1994;77(1-2):23-46. doi:10.3109/00207459408986016
  28. 28.
    Sandyk R. Improvement in short-term visual memory by weak electromagnetic fields in Parkinson’s disease. Int J Neurosci. 1995;81(1-2):67-82. doi:10.3109/00207459509015299
  29. 29.
    Sandyk R. Freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease is improved by treatment with weak electromagnetic fields. Int J Neurosci. 1996;85(1-2):111-124. doi:10.3109/00207459608986356
  30. 30.
    Lee S, Kim M, Chang W, Cho J, Youn J, Kim Y. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on freezing of gait in patients with Parkinsonism. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014;32(6):743-753. doi:10.3233/RNN-140397
  31. 31.
    Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Solé J, Brasil-Neto J, Cammarota A, Grafman J, Hallett M. Akinesia in Parkinson’s disease. II. Effects of subthreshold repetitive transcranial motor cortex stimulation. Neurology. 1994;44(5):892-898. doi:10.1212/wnl.44.5.892
  32. 32.
    Jacobson J, Yamanashi W. A physical mechanism in the treatment of neurologic disorders with externally applied pico Tesla magnetic fields. Panminerva Med. 1995;37(2):98-104. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8637778.

Share this article

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Most Recent
More Articles
November 12, 2020
November 17, 2018
July 14, 2020
Biobalance PEMF therapy devices

Stay Informed, Find Your Balance

The BioBalance PEMF is the most complete & affordable whole-body PEMF system. Join our newsletter to stay updated with latest research, PEMF product updates and special offers!